Introduction to Systematic Reviews

Held online over 4 mornings in September, this workshop will provide authors at the beginning of the systematic review process, with an in-depth understanding of how reviews are planned and conducted. It offers an insight to the development of a protocol, introducing participants to methodology, search methods, data extraction, risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis.

Dates: 18th, 19th, 24th & 25th September

Skill Level: Introductory

Register for this course here

Searching for Systematic Reviews: identifying, selecting and searching databases and other resources

The seminar will be delivered via Zoom from 3.00 – 6.00pm on March 18th and 20th.

This 2-day training event led by Julie Glanville and Carol Lefebvre will provide opportunities to review the value of a range of resources, to understand how to best search key resources and to consider the value of other search approaches. The sessions will include hints and tips for successful searching. There will be time to discuss best approaches, ask questions and to share insights.

Day 1: Key databases to search when conducting systematic reviews of healthcare

Day 2: Research discovery tools, trials registers, specialist databases and search guidance

Topics covered will include:

All videos and materials will be available to attendees for up to 30 days after the course.

An official Instats certificate of completion is provided at the conclusion of the training.

For more information: https://instats.org/seminar/searching-for-systematic-reviews-select4

If you would like to attend this course and the course running on March 11-13th, please use the link below to register for both simultaneously and benefit from a 10% discount.

https://instats.org/structuredcourse/searching-for-systematic-reviews-where-2

Searching for Systematic Reviews: Advanced Design Methods

The seminar will be delivered via Zoom from 3.00 – 6.00pm on March 11th & 13th.

Run by Julie Glanville & Carol Lefebvre this 2 day ‘design’ course will provide opportunities to learn new techniques for search term identification and search structuring for a range of review types, as well as an exploration of the benefits of text mining and AI tools for study identification. The importance of searching for retractions and errata will also be discussed. There will be time to discuss best approaches, ask questions and to share insights.

Day 1: Advanced design methods for PICO questions

Day 2: Design methods for complex questions and searches

All videos and materials will be available to attendees for up to 30 days after the course.

For more information: https://instats.org/seminar/searching-for-systematic-reviews-advanc4 

If you would like to attend this course and the course running on March 18-20th, please use the link below to register for both simultaneously and benefit from a 10% discount.

https://instats.org/structuredcourse/searching-for-systematic-reviews-where-2

Guidance on terminology, application and reporting of citation searching: the TARCiS Statement

Evidence Synthesis Ireland are holding a webinar on Thursday 20th February on Guidance on terminology, application and reporting of citation searching: the TARCiS Statement.

Presented by Dr. Julian Hirt (Research Fellow, University of Basel)and Dr. Christian Appenzeller-Herzog (Medical Information Specialist, University of Basel) this webinar will elaborate on the evidence base and potential benefit of citation searching in health-related evidence syntheses, an overview of citation searching methods, and a detailed presentation of the development and content of the TARCiS statement. The ten TARCiS recommendations on when and how to conduct and report citation searching will be highlighted.

Register for this webinar here

Events · Home

Developing strategic foresight and quality reviews: insight from the HRB

On 1st October the HSLG committee were delighted to welcome academic & health librarians for an in person CPD event in the Health Research Board. Brian Galvin spoke about managing uncertainty through strategic foresight, and Ailish FarragherCaitriona Lee and Louise Farragher gave a number of presentations on improving search strategy development and reporting for better evidence.

Foresight is an approach to planning and policymaking that attempts to manage uncertainty. It does that this by using a variety of tools to identify possible threats and opportunities in the medium or long-term. This is not prediction but an attempt to develop an information resource that helps with decision making in the present. Engaging in foresight work develops anticipatory capacity and enables a more active role in supporting policy making and mobilising joint action.

Improving search strategy development and reporting for better evidence – The IS team discussed how you can improve your search strategy development and reporting, ensuring your contribution to the review is to a high standard

  • using PRESS peer review of search strategies to improve your search strategy and choice of search resources
  • using available guidance for searching for systematic reviews, scoping reviews and rapid reviews (Cochrane, JBI etc)
  • using established quality assessment tools (AMSTAR, JBI for Systematic Reviews) to guide search decisions
  • using reporting standards (PRISMA-S) to guide search decisions and reporting

Guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching: using the TARCiS statement, and tools that can help.

Below are slides from these presentations:

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

 

Document versions of the presentations:

Quality Assessment Search Strategies (PDF)

TARCiS (Powerpoint)

Conference

Call for speakers HSLG Seminar 2020

The HSLG are hosting a seminar on February 13 2020, in the Ashling Hotel, Dublin.

 The theme of the Seminar is:

You can’t handle the truth: research integrity and truth in libraries

If you have anything to say about the librarians’ role relating to relevant themes including (but not limited to):

·        Research integrity

·        Promoting evidence

·        Fake news

·        Credibility

·        Imposter syndrome

·        Critical thinking

Presentations can be 10 or 20 minutes.

Please send us a short description of your presentation to contacthslg@gmail.com by Friday 6th December .

Speakers who are members of the LAI will be entered into a draw to win a bursary to IFLA 2020